DOI: https://doi.org/10.29025/2079-6021-2022-3-18-30

The Problem of Coordination Criteria for the Effectiveness of Judgments in the Genre of Political Interview

Authors: Viktoria A. Borisenko, Marina V. Laskova

---

Abstract: The purpose of the study is to prove that the coordination of criteria for the effectiveness of judgments put forward in the genre of political interview is observed not only between the journalist and the respondent («in the first frame»), but also between the actual participants of the conversation and the target audience («in the second frame»). It is proved that the interviewer and the respondent postulate and ratify the criteria for the effectiveness of the initiated points of view not only among themselves, but also for the third participant of the conversation – the audience, which is regarded as the most important arbiter, accepting or rejecting the propositional content of the dialogical replicas that construct the conversation. Based on Yu. Habermas’ theory of communicative action it is stated that due to the media specifics of the implementation of a political interview, the audience is not able to coordinate the status of the criteria for the truth of the judgments of the interviewer and the respondent directly «in the first frame». The public discuss these criteria among themselves or with other audiences. Taking into account the methods developed in the conversational analysis, the political interview is investigated as a discursive phenomenon with a dual status, namely as a process of publishing relevant information about the current situation by the interviewer and the respondent and the product of formation and decision-making about the situation in the country and the world by representatives of society. Impartial expression of opinions is carried out in a political interview not only based on a system of regulated exchange of remarks, but also as a result of contextual production and interpretation of linguistic phenomena that implement explicit and implicit semantics. It is indicated that the differentiation between surface language forms and deep semantic content, explicit meanings and implicit meanings is relevant. The necessity of using pragmatic principles for the analysis of media discourse based on such concepts as implicatures of meaning, communicative intentionality is substantiated. The ratification of the effectiveness criteria approved for judgments in the context of a political interview is carried out taking into account the communicative strategies of production and interpretation of semantic content.

Keywords: the genre of political interview, criteria for the effectiveness of judgments, regulated exchange of dialogic replicas, question-and-answer unity, communication strategy, communicative role.

For citation: Laskova M.V., Borisenko V.A. The Problem of Coordination Criteria for the Effectiveness of Judgments in the Genre of Political Interview. Current Issues in Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics. 2022, no 3, pp. 18–30 (In Russ.).

Bionote:
*Viktoria A. Borisenko¹, Marina V. Laskova²
Southern Federal University, 105/42 Bolshaya Sadovaya Str.,
Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation, 344006;
¹ORCID ID: 0000-0001-5065-9274; ² ORCID ID: 0000-0001-8612-8344;
 ¹Scopus Author ID: 57202187969; ²Scopus Author ID: 57191610724;
¹Web of Science Researcher ID: К-1231-2017; ²Web of Science Researcher: FBW-9717-2022;
*e-mail: v-bor@yandex.ru

Download issue

References:
1. Garkusha VV, Laskova MV, Lazarev VA. The Structure of the Linguistic Persona Phenomenon Study of Political Speakers. Humanities and social sciences. 2018; 6: 115-129. https://doi.org/10.18522/2070-1403-2018-71-6-115-129. (In Eng.). 
2. Bekoeva ID, Tameryan TYu. The role structure of pre-election communication. Current Issues in Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics. 2018; 3(31): 26-32. https://doi.org/10.29025/2079-6021-2018-3(31)-26-32. (In Russ.). 
3. Sadia S, Asgher M, Asgher T. A Pragmatic analysis of politeness strategies used by Pakistani and American politicians in interviews. Ilkogretim Online - Elementary Education Online. 2020; 19, 4: 3774-3783. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2020.04.764784. (In Eng.).
4. Vignozzi G. Assessing the language of TV political interviews: a corpus-assisted perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholar Publishing; 2019: 275. Available at: https:// www.cambridgescholars.com/resources/pdfs/978-1-5275-3520-6-sample.pdf. Accessed April 17, 2022.
5. Tameryan TYu, Zheltuchina MR, Zyubina IA, Magomadova TD, Antonova NY, Donskova LA. Internet Survey as a Mobile Digital Technology for Identifying the Development Interethnic Processes. Journal of Positive School Psychology. 2022; 6, 2: 1984-1992. Available at: https://journalppw.com/index.php/jpsp/article/view/1768/1069. Accessed April 12, 2022. (In Eng.). 
6. Tameryan TYu, Kusaeva ES. Speech portrait of the head of the North Ossetian region: discursive tracks 2021. Communicative research. 2021; 8,3: 579-594. https://doi.org/10.24147/2413-6182.2021.8(3).579-594. (In Russ.).
7. Lu T, Chudinov AP. Implicit and explicit tactics of evasion strategy in Russian and Chinese political interview. Issues of Cognitive Linguistics. 2018; 1(54): 76-82. https://doi.org/10.20916/1812-3228-2018-1-76-82. (In Eng.).
8. Kovtunenko IV, Borisenko VA, Bylkova SV, Minakova NA, Rogacheva VI. Interview as a Genre of New Media Communication: Rhetorical Relations and Pragmatic Effects. XLINGUAE. 2018; 11, 2: 95-105. https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2018.11.02.08. (In Eng.).
9. Kozhevnikova TA. Structural and genre specificity of the American political interview: argumentative and rhetorical aspect. Philological sciences. Questions of theory and practice. 2018; 1-2(79): 312-315. Доступно по: https:// semanticscholar.org/paper/СТРУКТУРНО-ЖАНРОВАЯ-СПЕЦИФИКА-АМЕРИКАНСКОГО-АСПЕКТ-Андреевна/500d1d8867e9e786b27067ad6eeffb1b66bf52e5. Accessed April 17, 2022. (In Russ.).
10. Balogun S, Murana MO. Language in political discourse: a pragmatic study of presupposition and politeness in the inaugural speech of President Donald Trump. Bulletin of Advanced English Studies. 2018; 1, 1: 64-76. https://doi.org/10.31559/BAES2018.1.1.6. (In Eng.).
11. Chashchina AM. Political interview as a special genre of political discourse. Proceedings of the Chelyabinsk State University. Philology. Art Studies. 2013; 37(328): 60-62. Available at: https:// cyberleninka.ru/article/n/politicheskoe-intervyu-kak-osobyy-zhanr-politicheskogo-diskursa/viewer. Accessed April 17, 2022. (In Russ.).
12. Boyko AK. Evaluation implementation models in dialogic communication (based on the material of modern English): monograph / AK. Boyko. Rostov-on-Don: DSTU; 2016: 144. Available at: https:// ntb.donstu.ru/content/201661?ysclid=l3pedklbef. Accessed April 17, 2022. (In Russ.).
13. Romanovskaya LV, Sunagatullina GH. Mitigation strategies in the discourse of English-language political interviews. Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod State Linguistic University named after N.A. Dobrolyubov. 2017; 40: 124-134. Available at: https://vestnik.lunn.ru/arhiv-zhurnala/2017-god/vypusk-40-4-kvartal-2017-g/40-10/. Accessed April 17, 2022. (In Russ.).
14.  Radulović M, Jovanović VŽ. The pragmeme of disagreement and its allopracts in English and Serbian political interview discourse. Pragmatics. 2020; 30, 4: 586-613. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.19013.rad. (In Eng.).
15. Omolabi I, Adedimeji MA. A pragmatic analysis of selected political interviews in a Nigerian newspaper. All Nations University Journal of Applied Thought. 2019; 6(2): 88-120. https://doi.org/:10.47987/OYIO6742. (In Eng.).
16. Lazarev VA. The media space of American society as portraying national and cultural information: monograph / V.A. Lazarev. Rostov-on-Don-Taganrog: Southern Federal University; 2021: 92. (In Russ.).
17. Lazarev VA, Ivchenko MV. Linguistic and translatological characteristics of business discourse: monograph / V.A. Lazarev, M.V. Ivchenko. Rostov-on-Don-Taganrog: Southern Federal University; 2019: 78.
18. Habermas Yu. Moral consciousness and communicative action: monograph / Habermas Yu. SPb: Nauka; 2001: 382. Available at: platona.net/load/knigi_po_filosofii/frankfurtskaja_shkola/khabermas_moralnoe_soznanie_i_kommunikativnoe_dejstvie/57-1-0-26? Accessed April 17, 2022. (In Russ.).

Количество показов: 284